Comments on: Hillary’s Proposal: Policy or Ploy?

By: Sub Gleim

Sub Gleim — Sun, 06 Apr 2008 12:12:01 +0000

Hillary is a dirty bitch.

By: Abdul khaliq

Abdul khaliq — Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:37:06 +0000

In the process of explaining we gave out information,like nukes are stored in pieces on different locations all over Pakistan.
we have PAL system on our hot weapons,
are we helping US to plan a massive strike on all the location of where these pieces are stored and PAL on hot weapons are jammed to finish chance of counter strike.It will be an unfortunate scenario but what choice is left
with Pakistan .
Nation need to know how many we have and how many per year we are making.Our minimum deterrence against threat from India is different than what we need to have to to make Israeli.s or anyone els to behave themselves.

By: Junaid

Junaid — Thu, 10 Jan 2008 03:54:53 +0000

if musharraf continues on this path not only will our nucleur weapons will be destroyed but our country will be dismembered.he is playing with fire.ofcourse he is showing usa that pakistan is unstable,to prolong his rule ,what do you expect american politicians to do.they will say what they want because musharraf has succesfully done their work for them…..showed pakistan as a failed state

By: imran tahir

imran tahir — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:06:49 +0000

she was crying today with tears at nh but good thing a concensus in pakistan about nuke that ia best defence against these idoits like hillry a looser.

By: Shaan Akbar

Shaan Akbar — Tue, 08 Jan 2008 22:20:58 +0000

Not taken seriously at all:

“Following her third place finish in Iowa at the hands of Senators Barack Obama and John Edwards, Sen. Clinton’s policy appears to be a ploy designed to attract attention to her campaign on the eve of the crucial New Hampshire primary.”

By: Riaz Haq

Riaz Haq — Tue, 08 Jan 2008 15:32:20 +0000

While the Hillary proposal sounds frightening, I would not take it seriously. However, when I see the Time cover story screaming out “We must save Pakistan”, it gives me pause to think what motives does the US have to “save Pakistan”. Is it to defend democracy? secularism? Or to maintain stability of its client state Pakistan vis-a-vis China and India? Is it to keep Iran at bay and keep the oil flowing from the Persian Gulf? The implications of serious trouble in Pakistan are very large for the entire region and the world.

By: noman habib

noman habib — Tue, 08 Jan 2008 09:57:35 +0000

1.The question is ”why the American public opinion views Pakistan as threat”.Pakistan
would not be able to pose a threat to USA in million years.We have no border dispute with them neither we claim to their rivals in international politics.
2.I think we need to float the idea of international team of monitors for all the nuclear weapons in the world may it be US,britain, china russia,israel,india france and Pakistan.The number of weapons,size should be told to all.The doctrine has to be told.As for as Pakistan is concerned we have pure defensive doctrine of employment of nukes aginst any agressor who brings us close to ”extinction as a soveriegne nation”.What is Israeli doctrine or british or americans or Indian for that matter.
3.I think the time for usual down play of nuclear arsenal is out dated for Pakistan.Hillary clinton is most welcome in Pakistan we are ready to show her all of our weapons provided she ask her country to open up their nuclear facilities,Israeli facilities and Indians as well.
4.There has to be some safeguards for transfer of nuclear technology to non state organisations
but to check the spread of knowldge is bit difficult in this age.
5.Anti pakistan propaganda in US is sold like hot cakes in US but what can we do except offering
USA ” NO WAR PACT”Pakistan will never be a
party in in any overt or open Attack on US main land or ever has been a party in the past however in regional propective Pakistan has her own interests to look after and we can not support imperialistic wars of Bush regime.

By: Hillary Clinton » Hillary’s Proposal: Policy or Ploy?

Hillary Clinton » Hillary’s Proposal: Policy or Ploy? — Tue, 08 Jan 2008 06:04:05 +0000

[...] Here’s another interesting post I read today by The Insider Brief [...]

By: Hillary Clinton » Hillary’s Proposal: Policy or Ploy?

Hillary Clinton » Hillary’s Proposal: Policy or Ploy? — Tue, 08 Jan 2008 05:06:46 +0000

[...] Here’s another interesting post I read today by Shaan Akbar [...]

By: Hillary Clinton » Blog Archive » Hillary’s Proposal: Policy or Ploy?

Hillary Clinton » Blog Archive » Hillary’s Proposal: Policy or Ploy? — Tue, 08 Jan 2008 04:36:51 +0000

[...] CNN Ticker Producer Alexander Mooney wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptLate Saturday night during a Democratic Party debate, presidential hopeful Senator Hillary Clinton stated that if elected president, she would propose joint US-British oversight of Pakistani nuclear weapons. Within hours, media outlets … [...]

By: Presidential election 2008 |Republicans Vs. Democrats » Hillary’s Proposal: Policy or Ploy?

Tue, 08 Jan 2008 04:21:11 +0000

[...] Proposal: Policy or Ploy? January 7th, 2008 Bookworm at Bookworm Room wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptLate Saturday night during a [...]