<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beltway Brief:  Obama Requests to Meet Pakistani Officials</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pakintel.com/2008/01/06/beltway-brief-obama-requests-to-meet-pakistani-officials/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pakintel.com/2008/01/06/beltway-brief-obama-requests-to-meet-pakistani-officials/</link>
	<description>An insider&#039;s view to Pakistan through critical intelligence, analysis and commentary.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:48:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Abdul khaliq</title>
		<link>http://www.pakintel.com/2008/01/06/beltway-brief-obama-requests-to-meet-pakistani-officials/comment-page-1/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>Abdul khaliq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 01:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pakintel.com/2008/01/06/beltway-brief-obama-requests-to-meet-pakistani-officials/#comment-160</guid>
		<description>Republicans will be winning presidential elections so it does not matter much what these guys bable about</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans will be winning presidential elections so it does not matter much what these guys bable about</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noman habib</title>
		<link>http://www.pakintel.com/2008/01/06/beltway-brief-obama-requests-to-meet-pakistani-officials/comment-page-1/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>noman habib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 10:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pakintel.com/2008/01/06/beltway-brief-obama-requests-to-meet-pakistani-officials/#comment-144</guid>
		<description>In last post please read &#039;&#039;Instinctive cheating by paranoid person</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In last post please read &#8221;Instinctive cheating by paranoid person</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noman habib</title>
		<link>http://www.pakintel.com/2008/01/06/beltway-brief-obama-requests-to-meet-pakistani-officials/comment-page-1/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>noman habib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 10:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pakintel.com/2008/01/06/beltway-brief-obama-requests-to-meet-pakistani-officials/#comment-143</guid>
		<description>It used to be like that ,no covert operation was possible in the region without support from ISI but this situation is no more.It was superior Political stance which harnessed intelligence and the people.ISI would know right away who is doing what and take preventive measures but now they can not claim this kind of capability.Covert operation inside Pakistan is possible and CIA can pull it alone thanks to hostilities between various segments of the society.This is the loss when policy makers don,t understand the difference between  planned and organized deception and intintive cheating of a paranoid person</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It used to be like that ,no covert operation was possible in the region without support from ISI but this situation is no more.It was superior Political stance which harnessed intelligence and the people.ISI would know right away who is doing what and take preventive measures but now they can not claim this kind of capability.Covert operation inside Pakistan is possible and CIA can pull it alone thanks to hostilities between various segments of the society.This is the loss when policy makers don,t understand the difference between  planned and organized deception and intintive cheating of a paranoid person</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abdul khaliq</title>
		<link>http://www.pakintel.com/2008/01/06/beltway-brief-obama-requests-to-meet-pakistani-officials/comment-page-1/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>Abdul khaliq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 03:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pakintel.com/2008/01/06/beltway-brief-obama-requests-to-meet-pakistani-officials/#comment-141</guid>
		<description>Musharaf should be given credit for cooperation with US and kicking them under the table when required however the covert operation against Pakistan should be replied with covert operation
and who has stoped pakistani media from taking on the occupation of Afghanistan.Our media is free to praise Afghan resistance and giving out plans how to kick occupation forces.It should be more like tit for tat but GOP will always be there to refute Pakistani media claims</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Musharaf should be given credit for cooperation with US and kicking them under the table when required however the covert operation against Pakistan should be replied with covert operation<br />
and who has stoped pakistani media from taking on the occupation of Afghanistan.Our media is free to praise Afghan resistance and giving out plans how to kick occupation forces.It should be more like tit for tat but GOP will always be there to refute Pakistani media claims</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: imran tahir</title>
		<link>http://www.pakintel.com/2008/01/06/beltway-brief-obama-requests-to-meet-pakistani-officials/comment-page-1/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>imran tahir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 17:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pakintel.com/2008/01/06/beltway-brief-obama-requests-to-meet-pakistani-officials/#comment-140</guid>
		<description>noman first of all these covert oprations not done by telling nytimes that we r doing this and doing that and second its not possible with the help of isi beacuse unilatrel actoins not interest of us it is possible joint covert oprations but said openly and unilaterly i dont think its possible that time now after seven years beacuse in 2005 rumsfield veto it saying too dangerous for us.SO its all media bull ith no substance i read that article it has nothing new yes they r sending trainers to train fc and may be tribel malatia and there r complaints that americans dont have even istructors availble fot that job so they every thing at high priorty thats why there Genrals were in pakistan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>noman first of all these covert oprations not done by telling nytimes that we r doing this and doing that and second its not possible with the help of isi beacuse unilatrel actoins not interest of us it is possible joint covert oprations but said openly and unilaterly i dont think its possible that time now after seven years beacuse in 2005 rumsfield veto it saying too dangerous for us.SO its all media bull ith no substance i read that article it has nothing new yes they r sending trainers to train fc and may be tribel malatia and there r complaints that americans dont have even istructors availble fot that job so they every thing at high priorty thats why there Genrals were in pakistan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noman habib</title>
		<link>http://www.pakintel.com/2008/01/06/beltway-brief-obama-requests-to-meet-pakistani-officials/comment-page-1/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>noman habib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 15:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pakintel.com/2008/01/06/beltway-brief-obama-requests-to-meet-pakistani-officials/#comment-139</guid>
		<description>1.Possibility of unilatral action by US special forces and CIA inside Pakistan and tribal region is a real threat now so for no problem but what is more worrysome  is our Berlin wall of intelligence inside Afghanistan and tribal belt has been breached effectively thanks to the political summersaults of policy makers.
2.We are back in the time of 80,s when late Soviet union will invade our tribal belt through bombings on daily basis but never launched a ground attack.At present NATO does not possess  the capability of ground war against Pakistan army with 40,000 troops.
3.If we let NATO/Afghan national army it will be an other Kashmir in the west which unaffordable.
4.We need to make elaborate civil defence net work in tribal region to minimise the loss to civil lives and physicaly man all the Durand line to thawrt any ground invasion with the support of locals</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.Possibility of unilatral action by US special forces and CIA inside Pakistan and tribal region is a real threat now so for no problem but what is more worrysome  is our Berlin wall of intelligence inside Afghanistan and tribal belt has been breached effectively thanks to the political summersaults of policy makers.<br />
2.We are back in the time of 80,s when late Soviet union will invade our tribal belt through bombings on daily basis but never launched a ground attack.At present NATO does not possess  the capability of ground war against Pakistan army with 40,000 troops.<br />
3.If we let NATO/Afghan national army it will be an other Kashmir in the west which unaffordable.<br />
4.We need to make elaborate civil defence net work in tribal region to minimise the loss to civil lives and physicaly man all the Durand line to thawrt any ground invasion with the support of locals</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hillary Clinton &#187; Beltway Brief: Obama Requests to Meet Pakistani Officials</title>
		<link>http://www.pakintel.com/2008/01/06/beltway-brief-obama-requests-to-meet-pakistani-officials/comment-page-1/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>Hillary Clinton &#187; Beltway Brief: Obama Requests to Meet Pakistani Officials</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 08:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pakintel.com/2008/01/06/beltway-brief-obama-requests-to-meet-pakistani-officials/#comment-138</guid>
		<description>[...] Here&#8217;s another interesting post I read today by The Insider Brief [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Here&#8217;s another interesting post I read today by The Insider Brief [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Presidential election 2008 &#124;Republicans Vs. Democrats &#187; Beltway Brief: Obama Requests to Meet Pakistani Officials</title>
		<link>http://www.pakintel.com/2008/01/06/beltway-brief-obama-requests-to-meet-pakistani-officials/comment-page-1/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>Presidential election 2008 &#124;Republicans Vs. Democrats &#187; Beltway Brief: Obama Requests to Meet Pakistani Officials</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 07:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pakintel.com/2008/01/06/beltway-brief-obama-requests-to-meet-pakistani-officials/#comment-137</guid>
		<description>[...] Off The Bus wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptUS Vice President, Dick Cheney, who currently manages US policy towards Pakistan, should visit Pakistan and ask President Musharraf to step down. Pakistan has many problems — including an anti-democratic president and an Islamist &#8230;   Read the rest of this great post here    Posted by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Off The Bus wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptUS Vice President, Dick Cheney, who currently manages US policy towards Pakistan, should visit Pakistan and ask President Musharraf to step down. Pakistan has many problems — including an anti-democratic president and an Islamist &#8230;   Read the rest of this great post here    Posted by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
