<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Boost for the PAF and French Relevancy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pakintel.com/2007/11/02/a-boost-for-the-paf-and-french-relevancy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pakintel.com/2007/11/02/a-boost-for-the-paf-and-french-relevancy/</link>
	<description>An insider&#039;s view to Pakistan through critical intelligence, analysis and commentary.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 20:47:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mohammad bilal</title>
		<link>http://www.pakintel.com/2007/11/02/a-boost-for-the-paf-and-french-relevancy/comment-page-1/#comment-14394</link>
		<dc:creator>mohammad bilal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 19:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pakintel.com/2007/11/02/a-boost-for-the-paf-and-french-relevancy/#comment-14394</guid>
		<description>well its good that Paf is thinking for improve versions of JF17, i would personally like that PAF should improve 2nd batch of 50 with atleast AESA radar, 9 hardpoints , more powerfull engine and more weapon load. for post 100 i think they should go for TVC engine , more powerfull and long range AESA radars, better weapons and avionics systems, more thrust to weight ratio , more weapons load, more internal fuel capacity or conformal fuel tanks, etc. im saying this because i think it would be much better for PAF and would also save money as we would not have to look for &quot;advance&quot; fighters from any one else. we should develop this fighter it would be great for PAF .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well its good that Paf is thinking for improve versions of JF17, i would personally like that PAF should improve 2nd batch of 50 with atleast AESA radar, 9 hardpoints , more powerfull engine and more weapon load. for post 100 i think they should go for TVC engine , more powerfull and long range AESA radars, better weapons and avionics systems, more thrust to weight ratio , more weapons load, more internal fuel capacity or conformal fuel tanks, etc. im saying this because i think it would be much better for PAF and would also save money as we would not have to look for &#8220;advance&#8221; fighters from any one else. we should develop this fighter it would be great for PAF .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter - Page 88 - Pakistan Defence Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.pakintel.com/2007/11/02/a-boost-for-the-paf-and-french-relevancy/comment-page-1/#comment-12090</link>
		<dc:creator>JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter - Page 88 - Pakistan Defence Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 19:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pakintel.com/2007/11/02/a-boost-for-the-paf-and-french-relevancy/#comment-12090</guid>
		<description>[...] Originally Posted by hasnain0099   A Boost for the PAF and French Relevancy Pakistan has been working hard to find a suitable, non-Chinese radar and missile package for its newly completed JF-17 Thunder fighter ..... ................. Let</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Originally Posted by hasnain0099   A Boost for the PAF and French Relevancy Pakistan has been working hard to find a suitable, non-Chinese radar and missile package for its newly completed JF-17 Thunder fighter &#8230;.. &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.. Let</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BVR capabilities of PAF - Page 3 - Pakistan Defence Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.pakintel.com/2007/11/02/a-boost-for-the-paf-and-french-relevancy/comment-page-1/#comment-1685</link>
		<dc:creator>BVR capabilities of PAF - Page 3 - Pakistan Defence Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 04:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pakintel.com/2007/11/02/a-boost-for-the-paf-and-french-relevancy/#comment-1685</guid>
		<description>[...] Originally Posted by fatman17   i have given proof! and i am still waiting for yours? and as far as wikipedia goes it is a lot of rubbish which a lot of senior forum members will agree!  further i dont want to get into a slanging match with you. i know some senior PAF pilots (base commander level) who have confirmed jane&#039;s information. i will go further to say that what if i told you that PAF has access to JSOW-154!    Those darn f-16&#039;s - Sepia Mutiny  A Boost for the PAF and French Relevancy &#124; The Insider Brief [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Originally Posted by fatman17   i have given proof! and i am still waiting for yours? and as far as wikipedia goes it is a lot of rubbish which a lot of senior forum members will agree!  further i dont want to get into a slanging match with you. i know some senior PAF pilots (base commander level) who have confirmed jane&#8217;s information. i will go further to say that what if i told you that PAF has access to JSOW-154!    Those darn f-16&#8217;s &#8211; Sepia Mutiny  A Boost for the PAF and French Relevancy | The Insider Brief [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Usman</title>
		<link>http://www.pakintel.com/2007/11/02/a-boost-for-the-paf-and-french-relevancy/comment-page-1/#comment-642</link>
		<dc:creator>Usman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 22:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pakintel.com/2007/11/02/a-boost-for-the-paf-and-french-relevancy/#comment-642</guid>
		<description>Jf-17 s is realy made by pakistan ? but i found a news  that jet engine of the jf is comig from Ussr.
 and can i say the jf is perfect fighter jet compare = F 22 raptar or uro fighter  or mig 29 
   
 jf 17  needs  more featurs like stealth fast acurat 
   and  leathel        i have a litle idea for jf like super dual jet sliders  or weapons like pin point acur..cy  and take of and land vertecal

         forgive me for my poor english ..but i knew somthing................</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jf-17 s is realy made by pakistan ? but i found a news  that jet engine of the jf is comig from Ussr.<br />
 and can i say the jf is perfect fighter jet compare = F 22 raptar or uro fighter  or mig 29 </p>
<p> jf 17  needs  more featurs like stealth fast acurat<br />
   and  leathel        i have a litle idea for jf like super dual jet sliders  or weapons like pin point acur..cy  and take of and land vertecal</p>
<p>         forgive me for my poor english ..but i knew somthing&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Assad</title>
		<link>http://www.pakintel.com/2007/11/02/a-boost-for-the-paf-and-french-relevancy/comment-page-1/#comment-492</link>
		<dc:creator>Assad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 17:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pakintel.com/2007/11/02/a-boost-for-the-paf-and-french-relevancy/#comment-492</guid>
		<description>Shan good article.  FH302 is correct that the IAF currently do not have the MICA in their inventory (but you never said that in your article either :-)

Their current BVR capability is limited to the first gen French 530D which is in the same class as US AIM-7 Sparrow.

The MICA is an amazing BVR AAM because it has the ability to engage targets in the WVR envelope as well at standoff (BVR) ranges so unlike most other BVR AAMs, it can be used in both types of engagement.

JANES recently did a piece on this JF-17/RC-400/MICA issue and this what they had to say about the JF-17:
&quot;One Western defence expert in Islamabad told Jane&#039;s that French missiles and radars could &quot;substantially improve the JF-17&#039;s future as a formidable fighter aircraft&quot;.

Overall the aircraft is coming along really nicely for the PAF.  I hope that this package with the French is finalized and goes through.  In between MICA and AIM-120C5s on the F-16, PAF will have a top-notch BVR capability.  I hope the WVR is also boosted by the purchase of AIM-9X for the F-16s so PAF can fully utilize the JHMCS on the F-16s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shan good article.  FH302 is correct that the IAF currently do not have the MICA in their inventory (but you never said that in your article either <img src='http://www.pakintel.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Their current BVR capability is limited to the first gen French 530D which is in the same class as US AIM-7 Sparrow.</p>
<p>The MICA is an amazing BVR AAM because it has the ability to engage targets in the WVR envelope as well at standoff (BVR) ranges so unlike most other BVR AAMs, it can be used in both types of engagement.</p>
<p>JANES recently did a piece on this JF-17/RC-400/MICA issue and this what they had to say about the JF-17:<br />
&#8220;One Western defence expert in Islamabad told Jane&#8217;s that French missiles and radars could &#8220;substantially improve the JF-17&#8217;s future as a formidable fighter aircraft&#8221;.</p>
<p>Overall the aircraft is coming along really nicely for the PAF.  I hope that this package with the French is finalized and goes through.  In between MICA and AIM-120C5s on the F-16, PAF will have a top-notch BVR capability.  I hope the WVR is also boosted by the purchase of AIM-9X for the F-16s so PAF can fully utilize the JHMCS on the F-16s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter - 2 - Page 68</title>
		<link>http://www.pakintel.com/2007/11/02/a-boost-for-the-paf-and-french-relevancy/comment-page-1/#comment-482</link>
		<dc:creator>JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter - 2 - Page 68</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pakintel.com/2007/11/02/a-boost-for-the-paf-and-french-relevancy/#comment-482</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: khekkSum89 &#187; A Boost for the PAF and French Relevancy</title>
		<link>http://www.pakintel.com/2007/11/02/a-boost-for-the-paf-and-french-relevancy/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>khekkSum89 &#187; A Boost for the PAF and French Relevancy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 13:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pakintel.com/2007/11/02/a-boost-for-the-paf-and-french-relevancy/#comment-56</guid>
		<description>[...] Check it out! While looking through the blogosphere we stumbled on an interesting post today.Here&#8217;s a quick excerptThe very same could happen with the RC-400 radar if a deal comes to fruition. More worrying is that India’s French-made Mirage 2000 aircraft are already equipped with MDBA’s Mica missile. Operating the Mica gives the Indians deep &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Check it out! While looking through the blogosphere we stumbled on an interesting post today.Here&#8217;s a quick excerptThe very same could happen with the RC-400 radar if a deal comes to fruition. More worrying is that India’s French-made Mirage 2000 aircraft are already equipped with MDBA’s Mica missile. Operating the Mica gives the Indians deep &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaan Akbar</title>
		<link>http://www.pakintel.com/2007/11/02/a-boost-for-the-paf-and-french-relevancy/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaan Akbar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 03:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pakintel.com/2007/11/02/a-boost-for-the-paf-and-french-relevancy/#comment-21</guid>
		<description>FH302,

Thanks for your kind words - I&#039;m glad you like the layout.  The Pakistan Policy Blog is my former blog to which I am no longer affiliated.  The Insider Brief is brand new and independent. 

- Shaan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FH302,</p>
<p>Thanks for your kind words &#8211; I&#8217;m glad you like the layout.  The Pakistan Policy Blog is my former blog to which I am no longer affiliated.  The Insider Brief is brand new and independent. </p>
<p>- Shaan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FH302</title>
		<link>http://www.pakintel.com/2007/11/02/a-boost-for-the-paf-and-french-relevancy/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>FH302</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 03:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pakintel.com/2007/11/02/a-boost-for-the-paf-and-french-relevancy/#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Shaan,
Appologize for nitpicking but from whatever i have read about their A2A arsenal it does not have Mica. They do however operate a similar French missile Matra Super 530D. As far as excercises are concerned, even PAF &#039;simulates&#039; Mica shots (as was reported for the last HighMark)
http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/IAF/Images/Weapons/AAMs/


I do agree with your conclusion regarding French dealings. 

P.S: Is this blog some how related to Pakistan policy blog? The overall layout of this blog is much better than policy blog. Keep up the good work :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shaan,<br />
Appologize for nitpicking but from whatever i have read about their A2A arsenal it does not have Mica. They do however operate a similar French missile Matra Super 530D. As far as excercises are concerned, even PAF &#8217;simulates&#8217; Mica shots (as was reported for the last HighMark)<br />
<a href="http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/IAF/Images/Weapons/AAMs/" rel="nofollow">http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/IAF/Images/Weapons/AAMs/</a></p>
<p>I do agree with your conclusion regarding French dealings. </p>
<p>P.S: Is this blog some how related to Pakistan policy blog? The overall layout of this blog is much better than policy blog. Keep up the good work <img src='http://www.pakintel.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaan Akbar</title>
		<link>http://www.pakintel.com/2007/11/02/a-boost-for-the-paf-and-french-relevancy/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaan Akbar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 01:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pakintel.com/2007/11/02/a-boost-for-the-paf-and-french-relevancy/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>FH302,

Had read in a few places that they operate the Mica, including an Aviation Week article where they described the USAF/IAF air exercises. I appreciate your input though. The basic gist remains the same: the French are incredibly duplicitous in their business dealings and their offers have the potential to compromise a Pakistani avionics/missile package.

- Shaan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FH302,</p>
<p>Had read in a few places that they operate the Mica, including an Aviation Week article where they described the USAF/IAF air exercises. I appreciate your input though. The basic gist remains the same: the French are incredibly duplicitous in their business dealings and their offers have the potential to compromise a Pakistani avionics/missile package.</p>
<p>- Shaan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FH302</title>
		<link>http://www.pakintel.com/2007/11/02/a-boost-for-the-paf-and-french-relevancy/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>FH302</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 20:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pakintel.com/2007/11/02/a-boost-for-the-paf-and-french-relevancy/#comment-15</guid>
		<description>A slight correction.Indian Mirage 2000s don&#039;t have Mica on them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A slight correction.Indian Mirage 2000s don&#8217;t have Mica on them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
